Growth vs Value
AMG Wealth Advisors
Past results are not an indication of future investment returns – this is an important principle of our philosophy. In this article we address the widening gap between growth equities and value equities and how current events are influencing our strategic outlook for the future.
So, what has happened?
The S&P 500 recently recorded its fifth straight month of net gains. We have witnessed cyclical growth stocks tied to the prospects of a reopening economy (restaurants, airlines, hotels, cruise lines, casinos, etc.) outperform as the market rebounded off of springtime lows. However, this rebound is not representative of the whole story.
Technology has been the key component of the S&P’s recent surge. Representing nearly 25% of the index, technology could be considered “the tail that wags the dog”. Prior to this phenomenon, there were no S&P 500 companies with a market cap of at least $1 trillion. Now there are four that match this criteria, with one of them valued individually at over $2 trillion. As of September 1st, the largest components of the index by market capitalization were:
1. AAPL: $2.25 Trillion
2. AMZN: $1.75 Trillion
3. MSFT: $1.71 Trillion
4. GOOG: $1.1 Trillion
For the first time, US technology is worth more than the totality of the entire European stock market.
Growth vs Value
Growth has significantly outperformed Value during this cycle largely due to the performance of the technology stocks listed above. The following chart shows the change in weighted average market cap between the Russell 1000 Growth Index and the Russell 1000 Value Index:
What can be attributed to outperformance?
Recent positive returns can simply be attributed to an increase in valuation. As you are likely well aware, growing valuation multiples equate to higher share prices. It’s not difficult then, to make a case that current valuations are significantly overextended, especially growth stock valuations. The chart below illustrates the disconnect of valuation growth and growth in fundamentals (EPS, earnings per share):
Why does this matter?
The typical direct correlation between Growth and Value stocks no longer exists as we have grown accustomed to. Historically, this disconnect is an outlier event. The question then remains, “Will this phenomenon continue, and if so, for how long?”. We see two potential paths moving forward:
1. Technology cools off. This benefits nearly all other market segments given the size of technology. According to Tavis McCourt of Raymond James, this is a statistically unlikely outcome and indexes are not recommended holdings at this time. A reversal would mean underperformance for technology moving forward despite the incredible run the sector has had.
2. The current Growth-Value stratum remains. This scenario would lead to continued outperformance in technology and growth stocks, while simultaneously maintaining underperformance in value stocks.
Our focus continues to be holding investments as determined by our Yield & Growth Framework. This means a diversified portfolio of high-quality stocks with a delicate balance of both growth and value holdings. As a matter of principle, we hold steadfast to our philosophy and process and are currently positioned to benefit if technology continues to outperform.
At the same time, we’ve selectively begun to add exposure to stocks that could benefit from a broad transition to the value sector, and continued our practice of actively managing hedges to minimize losses. It’s a constant balancing act and we’re confident in our ability to maintain an appropriate mix within risk tolerances.
If you have any questions regarding our investment philosophy, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any securities or to advise on the use or suitability of The AMG Managed Portfolio Series, or any of the underlying securities in isolation. Information specific to the underlying securities making up the portfolios can be found in the Funds’ prospectuses. Please carefully read the prospectus before making an investment decision.
This commentary offers generalized research, not personalized investment advice. It is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of our investment services or performance. Nothing on this fact sheet should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future investment returns. All investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to consult with an investment & tax professional before implementing any investment strategy.
Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. Investing in ETFs is subject to additional risks that do not apply to conventional mutual funds, including the risks that the market price of the shares may trade at a discount to its net asset value(“NAV), an active secondary market may not develop or be maintained, or trading may be halted by the exchange in which they trade, which may impact a fund’s ability to sell its shares. Shares of any ETF are bought and sold at Market Price (not NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the fund. Brokerage commissions will reduce returns. Market returns are based on the midpoint of the bid/ask spread at 4:00pm Eastern Time (when NAV is normally determined for most ETFs), and do not represent the returns you would receive if you traded shares at other times. Diversification is not a guarantee of performance and may not protect against loss of investment principal.